535.672.81 - Advanced Manufacturing Systems

Course Structure

The course materials are divided into modules which can be accessed by clicking Modules on the menu. A module may have several sections including the overview, content, readings, discussions, and assignments. You are encouraged to preview all sections of the module before starting. Most modules run for a period of seven (7) days, exceptions are noted on the Course Outline page. You should regularly check the Calendar and Announcements for assignment due dates. 

Course Topics

• Introduction to Advanced Manufacturing Systems
• Polymeric Materials
• Ceramic Materials
• Composite Materials
• Processing Metal Powders, Part 1
• Processing Metal Powders, Part 2
  
• Forming/Shaping Plastics and Composites
• Additive Manufacturing
• Abrasive Processes
• Advanced Machining Processes
• Microelectronics
• Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS)

Course Goals

The primary goal of this course is to impart to the student an understanding of advanced systems for the production of mechanical components using the latest technologies and methods. 

Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs)

• Explain theoretical principles and practical approaches to analyze advanced material and processing contributions to product cost and quality.
• Apply strategies and skills for improving cost and quality of manufactured parts and products.
• Challenge classical assumptions about good product design and production practice.
• Identify technological developments and their impact on manufacturing competitiveness.

Textbooks

Required 

Kalpakjian, S. and Schmid, S., (2013) Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, 8th Edition, Prentice Hall, either eText or Loose Leaf version. 

Loose Leaf ISBN-10: 0-13-564839-4 

Loose Leaf ISBN-13: 978-0-13-564839-1 

eText ISBN-10: 0-13-522860-3

 eText ISBN-13: 978-0-13-522860-9 

Textbook information for this course is available online through the appropriate bookstore website: For online courses, search the website at https://aip.bncollege.com/app/courselist/. 

Student Coursework Requirements

It is expected that each module will take approximately 7–10 hours per week to complete. Here is an approximate breakdown: reading the assigned sections of the texts (approximately 3–4 hours per week) as well as some outside reading, participating in lecture periods (approximately 2–3 hours per week), and writing assignments (approximately 2–3 hours per week). 

This course will consist of four basic student requirements:

Preparation and Participation (Module Discussions) (15% of Final Grade Calculation) 

You are responsible for carefully reading all assigned material and being prepared for lecture discussion. The majority of readings are from the course text. Additional reading may be assigned to supplement text readings. 

Evaluation of preparation and participation is based on contribution to discussions. 

Preparation and participation is evaluated by the following grading elements:

1. Timeliness (50%) 
2. Critical Thinking (50%)  

Assignments (30% of Final Grade Calculation)

Assignments will include a mix of qualitative and quantitative problem sets. Include a cover sheet with your name and assignment identifier. Also include your name and a page number indicator (i.e., page x of y) on each page of your submissions. Each problem should have the problem statement, assumptions, computations, and conclusions/discussion delineated. All Figures and Tables should be captioned and labeled appropriately. 

All assignments are due according to the dates in the Calendar. 

Late submissions will be reduced by one letter grade for each week late (no exceptions without prior coordination with the instructor). 

If, after submitting a written assignment you are not satisfied with the grade received, you are encouraged to redo the assignment and resubmit it. If the resubmission results in a better grade, that grade will be substituted for the previous grade. 

Qualitative assignments are evaluated by the following grading elements:

1. Each part of question is answered (20%) 
2. Writing quality and technical accuracy (30%) (Writing is expected to meet or exceed accepted graduate-level English and scholarship standards. That is, all assignments will be graded on grammar and style as well as content). 
3. Rationale for answer is provided (20%) 
4. Examples are included to illustrate rationale (15%) (If you do not have direct experience related to a particular question, then you are to provide analogies versus examples). 
5. Outside references are included (15%) 

Qualitative assignments are graded as follows: 

100–90 = A—All parts of question are addressed; Writing Quality/ Rationale/ Examples/ Outside References [rich in content; full of thought, insight, and analysis]. 

89–80 = B—All parts of the question are addressed; Writing Quality/ Rationale/ Examples/ Outside References [substantial information; thought, insight, and analysis has taken place]. 

79–70=C—Majority of parts of the question are addressed; Writing Quality/ Rationale/ Examples/ Outside References [generally competent; information is thin and commonplace]. 

<70=F—Some parts of the question are addressed; Writing Quality/ Rationale/ Examples/ Outside References [rudimentary and superficial; no analysis or insight displayed]. 

Quantitative assignments are evaluated by the following grading elements:

1. Each part of question is answered (20%) 
2. Assumptions are clearly stated (20%) 
3. Intermediate derivations and calculations are provided (25%) 
4. Answer is technically correct and is clearly indicated (25%) 
5. Answer precision and units are appropriate (10%) 

Quantitative assignments are graded as follows: 

100–90 = A—All parts of question are addressed; All assumptions are clearly stated; All intermediate derivations and calculations are provided; Answer is technically correct and is clearly indicated; Answer precision and units are appropriate. 

89–80 = B—All parts of question are addressed; All assumptions are clearly stated; Some intermediate derivations and calculations are provided; Answer is technically correct and is indicated; Answer precision and units are appropriate. 

79–70=C—Most parts of question are addressed; Assumptions are partially stated; Few intermediate derivations and calculations are provided; Answer is not technically correct but is indicated; Answer precision and units are indicated but inappropriate. 

<70=F—Some parts of the question are addressed; Assumptions are not stated; Intermediate derivations and calculations are not provided; The answer is incorrect or missing; The answer precision and units are inappropriate or missing. 

Quizzes (20% of Final Grade Calculation) 

The quizzes will be available in Modules 3, 6, 9, and 12.  

The quizzes are evaluated by the following grading elements:

1. Each part of question is answered (20%) 
2. Writing quality and technical accuracy (30%) (Writing is expected to meet or exceed accepted graduate-level English and scholarship standards. That is, all assignments will be graded on grammar and style as well as content). 
3. Rationale for answer is provided (20%) 
4. Examples are included to illustrate rationale (15%) (If a student does not have direct experience related to a particular question, then the student is to provide analogies versus examples). 
5. Outside references are included (15%) 

Quizzes are graded as follows: 

100–90 = A—All parts of question are addressed; Writing Quality/ Rationale/ Examples/ Outside References [rich in content; full of thought, insight, and analysis]. 

89–80 = B—All parts of the question are addressed; Writing Quality/ Rationale/ Examples/ Outside References [substantial information; thought, insight, and analysis has taken place]. 

79–70 = C—Majority of parts of the question are addressed; Writing Quality/ Rationale/ Examples/ Outside References [generally competent; information is thin and commonplace]. 

<70 = F—Some parts of the question are addressed; Writing Quality/ Rationale/ Examples/ Outside References [rudimentary and superficial; no analysis or insight displayed].

Course Group Project (35% of Final Grade Calculation) 

A course team project will be assigned one week into the course. Modules 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 10 will include a progression of activities for the course group project. 

The course team project is evaluated by the following grading elements:

1. Student preparation and participation (as described in Course Project Description) (40%) 
2. Student technical understanding of the course project topic (as related to individual role that the student assumes and described in the Course Project Description) (20%) 
3. Team preparation and participation (as described in Course Project Description) (20%) 
4. Team technical understanding of the course project topic (as described in the Course Project Description) (20%) 

The Course Group Project is graded as follows: 

100–90 = A—Student Preparation and Participation/ Team Preparation and Participation [individual/ team roles and responsibilities well defined and understood; individual/ team well versed in use of Adobe Connect; individual/ team work product(s) agreed to, well prepared and available to all team members/ instructors]; Student Understanding/ Team Understanding [rich in content; full of thought, insight, and analysis]. 

89–80 = B—Student Preparation and Participation/ Team Preparation and Participation [individual/ team roles and responsibilities well defined and understood; individual/ team well versed in use of Adobe Connect; individual/ team work product(s) agreed to and prepared]; Student Understanding/ Team Understanding [substantial information; thought, insight, and analysis has taken place]. 

79–70 = C—Student Preparation and Participation/ Team Preparation and Participation [individual/ team roles and responsibilities agreed to; individual/ team well versed in use of Adobe Connect; individual/ team work product(s) prepared]; Student Understanding/ Team Understanding [generally competent; information is thin and commonplace]. 

<70 = F—Student Preparation and Participation/ Team Preparation and Participation [individual/ team roles and responsibilities not well understood; individual/ team has difficult with use of Adobe Connect; individual/ team work product(s) partially prepared]; Student Understanding/ Team Understanding [rudimentary and superficial; no analysis or insight displayed]. 

Grading Policy

Assignments are due according to the dates posted in your Canvas course site. You may check these due dates in the Course Calendar or the Assignments in the corresponding modules. I will post grades one week after assignment due dates. 

I generally do not directly grade spelling and grammar. However, egregious violations of the rules of the English language will be noted without comment. Consistently poor performance in either spelling or grammar is taken as an indication of poor written communication ability that may detract from your grade. 

A grade of A indicates achievement of consistent excellence and distinction throughout the course—that is, conspicuous excellence in all aspects of assignments and discussion in every week. 

A grade of B indicates work that meets all course requirements on a level appropriate for graduate academic work. These criteria apply to both undergraduates and graduate students taking the course. 

Final grades will be determined by the following weighting: 

Academic Policies

Deadlines for Adding, Dropping and Withdrawing from Courses

Students may add a course up to one week after the start of the term for that particular course. Students may drop courses according to the drop deadlines outlined in the EP academic calendar (https://ep.jhu.edu/student-services/academic-calendar/). Between the 6th week of the class and prior to the final withdrawal deadline, a student may withdraw from a course with a W on their academic record. A record of the course will remain on the academic record with a W appearing in the grade column to indicate that the student registered and withdrew from the course.

Academic Misconduct Policy

All students are required to read, know, and comply with the Johns Hopkins University Krieger School of Arts and Sciences (KSAS) / Whiting School of Engineering (WSE) Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct by Full-Time and Part-Time Graduate Students.

This policy prohibits academic misconduct, including but not limited to the following: cheating or facilitating cheating; plagiarism; reuse of assignments; unauthorized collaboration; alteration of graded assignments; and unfair competition. Course materials (old assignments, texts, or examinations, etc.) should not be shared unless authorized by the course instructor. Any questions related to this policy should be directed to EP’s academic integrity officer at ep-academic-integrity@jhu.edu.

Students with Disabilities - Accommodations and Accessibility

Johns Hopkins University values diversity and inclusion. We are committed to providing welcoming, equitable, and accessible educational experiences for all students. Students with disabilities (including those with psychological conditions, medical conditions and temporary disabilities) can request accommodations for this course by providing an Accommodation Letter issued by Student Disability Services (SDS). Please request accommodations for this course as early as possible to provide time for effective communication and arrangements.

For further information or to start the process of requesting accommodations, please contact Student Disability Services at Engineering for Professionals, ep-disability-svcs@jhu.edu.

Student Conduct Code

The fundamental purpose of the JHU regulation of student conduct is to promote and to protect the health, safety, welfare, property, and rights of all members of the University community as well as to promote the orderly operation of the University and to safeguard its property and facilities. As members of the University community, students accept certain responsibilities which support the educational mission and create an environment in which all students are afforded the same opportunity to succeed academically. 

For a full description of the code please visit the following website: https://studentaffairs.jhu.edu/policies-guidelines/student-code/

Classroom Climate

JHU is committed to creating a classroom environment that values the diversity of experiences and perspectives that all students bring. Everyone has the right to be treated with dignity and respect. Fostering an inclusive climate is important. Research and experience show that students who interact with peers who are different from themselves learn new things and experience tangible educational outcomes. At no time in this learning process should someone be singled out or treated unequally on the basis of any seen or unseen part of their identity. 
 
If you have concerns in this course about harassment, discrimination, or any unequal treatment, or if you seek accommodations or resources, please reach out to the course instructor directly. Reporting will never impact your course grade. You may also share concerns with your program chair, the Assistant Dean for Diversity and Inclusion, or the Office of Institutional Equity. In handling reports, people will protect your privacy as much as possible, but faculty and staff are required to officially report information for some cases (e.g. sexual harassment).

Course Auditing

When a student enrolls in an EP course with “audit” status, the student must reach an understanding with the instructor as to what is required to earn the “audit.” If the student does not meet those expectations, the instructor must notify the EP Registration Team [EP-Registration@exchange.johnshopkins.edu] in order for the student to be retroactively dropped or withdrawn from the course (depending on when the "audit" was requested and in accordance with EP registration deadlines). All lecture content will remain accessible to auditing students, but access to all other course material is left to the discretion of the instructor.