This course studies the physics and the history of our utilization of space, the challenges and mitigation of making in situ observations in space. Topics include the history of solar system exploration; the solar cycle; the electrodynamics of the solar upper atmosphere responsible for the solar wind; and the solar wind interaction with unmagnetized and magnetized bodies—how this leads to planetary bow shocks, comets, and magnetospheres and how they are studied. Practical issues include penetrating radiation and its effects on spacecraft and man in space, magnetospheric storm disruptions of ground power distribution and spacecraft charging in the presence and absence of solar illumination with particular reference to applying this knowledge in exploring the outer solar system and beyond.
The course materials are divided into 14 modules which can be accessed by clicking Course Modules on the course menu. A module will have several sections including the overview, content, readings, discussions, and assignments. You are encouraged to preview all sections of the module before starting. Most modules run for a period of seven (7) days, exceptions are noted in the Course Outline. You should regularly check the Calendar and Announcements for assignment due dates.
REQUIRED: Russell, C., Luhmann, J., & Strangeway, R. (2016). Space physics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9781107098824
OPTIONAL: Baumjohann, W., & Treumann, R. A. (1996). Basic space plasma physics (1st ed.). London: Imperial College Press.
Preparation and Participation (10% of Final Grade Calculation)
You are responsible for carefully reading all assigned material and being prepared for discussion. The majority of readings are from the course text. Additional reading may be assigned to supplement text readings. Video content is also often available to supplement text readings.
Post your initial response to the discussion questions by the evening of day 4 for that module week. Posting a response to the discussion question is part one of your grade for module discussions (i.e., Timeliness).
Part two of your grade for module discussion is your interaction (i.e., responding to classmate postings with thoughtful responses) with at least two classmates (i.e., Critical Thinking). Just posting your response to a discussion question is not sufficient; we want you to interact with your classmates. Be detailed in your postings and in your responses to your classmates' postings. Feel free to agree or disagree with your classmates. Please ensure that your postings are civil and constructive.
I will monitor module discussions and will respond to some of the discussions as discussions are posted. In some instances, I will summarize the overall discussions and post the summary for the module.
Evaluation of preparation and participation is based on contribution to discussions.
Preparation and participation are evaluated by the following grading elements:
Timeliness (50%)
Critical Thinking (50%)
Preparation and participation are graded as follows:
Assignments (50% of Final Grade Calculation)
Assignments will include a mix of projects (i.e. researching a topic and reporting out in presentation format), problem sets, and interactive space physics exercises. For all assignments, include a cover sheet with your name and assignment identifier. Also include your name and a page number indicator (i.e., page x of y) on each page of your submissions. For projects, ensure all sources are cited for non-original content (e.g. figures from literature, text generated from generative AI tools) and that all figures and tables are captioned and labeled appropriately. For problem sets, organize each problem response neatly and clearly identify the problem statement, assumptions, computations, and conclusions.
All assignments are due according to the dates in the Calendar.
Late submissions will be reduced by one letter grade for each week late (no exceptions without prior coordination with the instructor).
If, after submitting a written assignment you are not satisfied with the grade received, you are encouraged to redo the assignment and resubmit it. If the resubmission results in a better grade, that grade will be substituted for the previous grade.
Project assignments are evaluated by the following grading elements:
Project assignments are graded as follows:
Problem sets and interactive exercise assignments are evaluated by the following grading elements:
Quantitative assignments are graded as follows:
Midterm Exam (15% of Final Grade Calculation)
The midterm exam will be available in Module 7. You will have one week to complete the midterm exam; it will be due on Day 7 of Module 7. This exam is open book, open notes, and not timed. This exam must be completed independently. You can choose the format for submission; either writing your answers out by hand on a clean sheet of paper and scanning to submit a PDF or by typing your responses into a document are acceptable.
The exam is evaluated by the following grading elements:
The exam is graded as follows:
Final Project (25% of Final Grade Calculation)
The final project will be assigned during Module 8. The final project will be delivered incrementally over the time period between Modules 8 and 14. In Module 8, the final project topic proposal is due. In Modules 9 and 10 literature survey references will be submitted for credit and feedback. In Module 11, the final project outline is due. In Module 12 you will submit your draft presentation for credit and feedback. Finally, in Module 13, you will finalize your presentation and record the delivery. In Module 14 you will post the video to Canvas for comment by your classmates. Participating in the discussion of classmate’s final project videos is graded as a portion of your final project grade.
The final project is broken down into these deliverables over the second half of the course to ensure that each student receives feedback from the instructor on the suitability of their project topic, literature references, outline of content, and draft presentation content/format/style.
Please see the Final Project Overview for detailed breakdown of the final project deliverables and rubric for grading.
Assignments are due according to the dates posted in the Canvas course site. You may check these due dates in the Course Calendar or the Assignments in the corresponding modules. I will post grades one week after assignment due dates.
We generally do not directly grade spelling and grammar. However, egregious violations of the rules of the English language will be noted without comment. Consistently poor performance in either spelling or grammar is taken as an indication of poor written communication ability that may detract from your grade.
A grade of A indicates achievement of consistent excellence and distinction throughout the course—that is, conspicuous excellence in all aspects of tests, projects, assignments and discussion in every week.
A grade of B indicates work that meets all course requirements on a level appropriate for graduate academic work. These criteria apply to both undergraduates and graduate students taking the course.
EP uses a +/- grading system (see “Grading System”, Graduate Programs catalog, p. 10).
100-98 = A+ 97-94 = A 93-90 = A− 89-87 = B+ 86-83 = B 82-80 = B− 79-77 = C+ 76-73 = C 72-70 = C− 69-67 = D+ 66-63 = D <63 = F
Final grades will be determined by the following weighting:
Item | % of Grade |
Preparation and Participation | 10% |
Assignments | 50% |
Midterm Exam | 15% |
Course Project | 25% |
It is expected that all students work independently to complete all discussions, assignments, exams, and projects. Discussion of coursework and assignments is encouraged between the students, but all submitted work must be original and completed independently.
Generative AI Policy
Generative AI tools such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini are allowed to be used during this course. These tools can be particularly helpful in finding scholarly articles for your research projects. It is required that you check all output for accuracy and cite the use of generative AI tools as a reference following this example APA citation style:
OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (Mar 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat Parenthetical citation: (OpenAI, 2023) Narrative citation: OpenAI (2023)
Note that this citation is not accepted as one of your 3 final project presentation references but it must be listed in addition to your 3 references if generative AI tools are used.
Remember that Generative AI is just another tool in your toolbox for creating your own original work and should not be used to directly generate problem set answers, discussion responses, or project/presentation content. Any work turned in that can be shown to be a direct copy and paste of a generative AI tool response will be given a zero.
Deadlines for Adding, Dropping and Withdrawing from Courses
Students may add a course up to one week after the start of the term for that particular course. Students may drop courses according to the drop deadlines outlined in the EP academic calendar (https://ep.jhu.edu/student-services/academic-calendar/). Between the 6th week of the class and prior to the final withdrawal deadline, a student may withdraw from a course with a W on their academic record. A record of the course will remain on the academic record with a W appearing in the grade column to indicate that the student registered and withdrew from the course.
Academic Misconduct Policy
All students are required to read, know, and comply with the Johns Hopkins University Krieger School of Arts and Sciences (KSAS) / Whiting School of Engineering (WSE) Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct by Full-Time and Part-Time Graduate Students.
This policy prohibits academic misconduct, including but not limited to the following: cheating or facilitating cheating; plagiarism; reuse of assignments; unauthorized collaboration; alteration of graded assignments; and unfair competition. Course materials (old assignments, texts, or examinations, etc.) should not be shared unless authorized by the course instructor. Any questions related to this policy should be directed to EP’s academic integrity officer at ep-academic-integrity@jhu.edu.
Students with Disabilities - Accommodations and Accessibility
Johns Hopkins University values diversity and inclusion. We are committed to providing welcoming, equitable, and accessible educational experiences for all students. Students with disabilities (including those with psychological conditions, medical conditions and temporary disabilities) can request accommodations for this course by providing an Accommodation Letter issued by Student Disability Services (SDS). Please request accommodations for this course as early as possible to provide time for effective communication and arrangements.
For further information or to start the process of requesting accommodations, please contact Student Disability Services at Engineering for Professionals, ep-disability-svcs@jhu.edu.
Student Conduct Code
The fundamental purpose of the JHU regulation of student conduct is to promote and to protect the health, safety, welfare, property, and rights of all members of the University community as well as to promote the orderly operation of the University and to safeguard its property and facilities. As members of the University community, students accept certain responsibilities which support the educational mission and create an environment in which all students are afforded the same opportunity to succeed academically.
For a full description of the code please visit the following website: https://studentaffairs.jhu.edu/policies-guidelines/student-code/
Classroom Climate
JHU is committed to creating a classroom environment that values the diversity of experiences and perspectives that all students bring. Everyone has the right to be treated with dignity and respect. Fostering an inclusive climate is important. Research and experience show that students who interact with peers who are different from themselves learn new things and experience tangible educational outcomes. At no time in this learning process should someone be singled out or treated unequally on the basis of any seen or unseen part of their identity.
If you have concerns in this course about harassment, discrimination, or any unequal treatment, or if you seek accommodations or resources, please reach out to the course instructor directly. Reporting will never impact your course grade. You may also share concerns with your program chair, the Assistant Dean for Diversity and Inclusion, or the Office of Institutional Equity. In handling reports, people will protect your privacy as much as possible, but faculty and staff are required to officially report information for some cases (e.g. sexual harassment).
Course Auditing
When a student enrolls in an EP course with “audit” status, the student must reach an understanding with the instructor as to what is required to earn the “audit.” If the student does not meet those expectations, the instructor must notify the EP Registration Team [EP-Registration@exchange.johnshopkins.edu] in order for the student to be retroactively dropped or withdrawn from the course (depending on when the "audit" was requested and in accordance with EP registration deadlines). All lecture content will remain accessible to auditing students, but access to all other course material is left to the discretion of the instructor.